30 Years After The Verdict, O.J. Simpson’s Lawyer Says The Real Casualty Was Faith In Justice

Three decades ago, the verdict in the O.J. Simpson trial evoked mixed feelings across America—while half of the country breathed a sigh of relief, the other half reacted in shock. I was part of the defense team commonly referred to as the "Dream Team," and I distinctly recall the profound emotions that ensued. However, I also reminisce about an essential element we've since forgotten: our respect for the rule of law. During that contentious time, President Bill Clinton, despite likely disagreeing with the jury's finding, refrained from disparaging jurors or dismissing their intelligence. He honored the judicial process, thereby setting a commendable standard for the nation.Unlike today, the Simpson verdict did not spark violence or political leaders stoking anger. The current polarization and social media frenzy would likely exacerbate conflicts if such a trial were to occur today. This evolution raises significant concerns about our democracy’s foundation, which hinges on collective adherence to justice and law.