The Birthright Citizenship Debate: Should It Stay or Be Reformed?

Sedrick Hamner from College Park asserts that the United States, like many nations, recognizes birthright citizenship as an inherent right. He emphasizes the duty of American leadership to uphold this constitutional principle. However, he provocatively questions the status of many individuals in power should this law change, asserting that birthright citizens must be protected to maintain the nation’s ideals of freedom and bravery.Chris Reid, hailing from Atlanta, offers a thought-provoking view, noting that no one has original ties to this land. With roots in Barbados, he argues that removing birthright citizenship would unjustly affect many, criticizing the selective enforcement of laws as problematic.Vince White from West End believes that birthright citizenship, as enshrined in the Constitution, is a fundamental right for all.Vena Critchlos from East Point contends that anyone born in the U.S. deserves citizenship, seeing current restrictions as a potential threat to equality and justice.Brett Jackson of Stone Mountain firmly believes that anyone born on U.S. soil should unequivocally be granted citizenship, regardless of their parentage, insisting that this principle should remain unchanged.The dialogue around birthright citizenship reveals deep convictions reflective of broader societal values.