Your Voice: What are your thoughts on the Supreme Court supporting legal immunity for the President during their term in office?

K. Calloway Atlanta “I feel like the Supreme Court, giving absolute immunity to the President, is pretty insane in a sense, because the president is human and with them granting immunity, it’s allowing the President to do whatever [he wants] as long as he can back it up within [the confines of] the job. And the way some Presidents work, they can justify what they do, even when they’re wrong. So I think that’s when we start thinking about that human trait coming into your job. It’s pretty bad since there is no telling what they can justify. Bombings, assassinations, all of that.” Miyana Sarver Atlanta “I believe that giving the President absolute immunity is pretty much ushering us into dictatorship. It’s a very dangerous game, giving someone immunity to the law. It can bypass a lot of wrongdoings on the part of the people. I’m a very sci-fi fantasy person myself. And any time that the president, king, or queen argue amongst themselves, it hurts the poor and little people. So, I think that giving a president absolute immunity would just hurt the poor. It’ll make the poor poorer and make the rich stronger. And they can overturn any...