Revisiting Confederate Names: How the Department of Defense Undermines American Values

"Why would we not choose to honor the remarkable heroes within the U.S. Army? They embody the finest qualities of America—individuals with inspiring narratives." – Brigadier General Ty Seidule (Ret.), former vice chairman of the Naming Commission (TriceEdneyWire.com) – In 2020, amidst the national outcry against systemic racism following George Floyd's tragic death, the U.S. Department of Defense embarked on a significant step—beginning the renaming process for military installations named after Confederate generals, individuals who fought to uphold slavery and fragment the Union. This action was not mere symbolism. It represented a committed effort to uphold the principles of unity, equality, and democratic service, superseding the legacy of white supremacy. However, this progress is now jeopardized. Reports indicate that the Department of Defense may reconsider or feel compelled to revert to Confederate names, which signifies not only a policy shift but a moral compromise. These combat zones, rebranded from Fort Bragg [now Fort Liberty] to Fort Hood [now Fort Cavazos], transformed not to erase the past, but to amend it. Asking diverse service members to honor those who opposed the nation’s values is indefensible. Confederate nomenclature does not epitomize "Southern heritage"; it resonates with a history of racial violence and...